|
|
·
Interactive
planning workflow… The workflows
defining the planning session are very interactive in nature. The operator can
actually decide how much he/she wants to drive the system by means of a
friendly interface designed for this purpose. In fact, on one extreme he/she
could just decide to set only the main parameters like max trim-loss accepted
allowing the system optimizing all the rest based on the modeled/customized
criteria that capture the company best practice. However, there are cases where
he / she might need to drive the system choices more firmly perhaps identifying
orders that have to be absolutely included, shrinking the set of coils to be
used, forcing the system to allocate the plan on a
certain machine. Thanks to these kind of interactive
and flexible workflows it becomes quite natural to test deeply and quickly
several hypothesis that could not have been even roughly investigated without
such a helpful support. A quite simple but common example is the following: a
set of orders for a given customer, product, thickness, quality has to be
urgently delivered but they do not combine easily in terms of width / weight
and it is also quite difficult to find a good plan even taking into
consideration other short term orders. To explore the solution space the
operator could easily ask CCO to quickly test different scenarios like: what if
I enlarge the candidate orders moving the horizon or including open orders?
What is the minimum trim loss I have to pay should I consider only short term
orders and accept to increase trim loss thresholds ? The different solutions emerging from different
scenarios can be easily compared both through synthetic KPIs as well as through
more analytical descriptions. At the end, before validating the best solution, the operator can still change manually a few
things on the plan while the system will always control the consistency of
these changes (should not violate any constraints). Each interesting solution
can either be saved or even frozen to allocate material and eventually sent
back to Legacy or ERP for plan execution.
·
A modular architecture
… COIL
CUT OPTIMIZER can work, if necessary, with different work stations either
dedicated to different product families or even dedicated to different
functions (eg : planning, supervisor and cost
control, execution control). The technical integration with the ERP or legacy
system can be done in three different ways depending on the characteristics of
the ERP / legacy architecture (flat files, CCO native DB, CCO dedicated DB
tables defined on the company repository or warehouse). All these different
methodologies have the same objective : adapt CCO
architecture to the already existing information system in such a way that
integration effort is minimized and data redundancy is avoided.