|
|
·
Interactive
planning workflow… The workflows defining the planning session are very
interactive in nature. The operator can actually decide how much he/she wants
to drive the system by means of a friendly interface designed for this purpose.
In fact, on one extreme he/she could just decide to set only the main
parameters like max trim-loss accepted allowing the system optimizing all the
rest based on the modeled/customized criteria that capture the company best
practice. However, there are cases where he / she might need to drive the system
choices more firmly perhaps identifying orders that have to be absolutely
included, shrinking the set of coils to be used, forcing the system to allocate
the plan on a certain machine. Thanks to these kind of interactive and flexible
workflows it becomes quite natural to test deeply and quickly several
hypothesis that could not have been even roughly investigated without such a
helpful support. A quite simple but common example is the following: a set of
orders for a given customer, product, thickness, quality has to be urgently
delivered but they do not combine easily in terms of width / weight and it is
also quite difficult to find a good plan even taking into consideration other
short term orders. To explore the solution space the operator could easily ask
CCO to quickly test different scenarios like: what if I enlarge the candidate
orders moving the horizon or including open orders? What is the minimum trim
loss I have to pay should I consider only short term orders and accept to
increase trim loss thresholds ? The
different solutions emerging from different scenarios can be easily compared
both through synthetic KPIs as well as through more analytical descriptions. At
the end, before validating the best solution, the operator can still change
manually a few things on the plan while the system will always control the
consistency of these changes (should not violate any constraints). Each
interesting solution can either be saved or even frozen to allocate material
and eventually sent back to Legacy or ERP for plan execution.
·
A modular architecture … COIL CUT
OPTIMIZER can work, if necessary, with different work stations either dedicated
to different product families or even dedicated to different functions (eg :
planning, supervisor and cost control, execution control). The technical
integration with the ERP or legacy system can be done in three different ways
depending on the characteristics of the ERP / legacy architecture (flat files,
CCO native DB, CCO dedicated DB tables defined on the company repository or
warehouse). All these different methodologies have the same objective : adapt
CCO architecture to the already existing information system in such a way that
integration effort is minimized and data redundancy is avoided.